The whole idea is so insane... it's mind blowing. The animal doesn't fit underneath the seat. It's clearly taking up leg room of the passengers next to it. I

The whole idea is so insane... it's mind blowing. The animal doesn't fit underneath the seat. It's clearly taking up leg room of the passengers next to it. I understand making accommodations for people with disabilities. But there's a trend in this country: Group A has X problem. Group A proposes a solution that violates Group B's life and liberty. Group B complains. Everyone gets angry at Group B, because 'how else could Group A get a solution'. The answer is simple: It's not Group B's problem. Why people think their problem (emotional support needs) should be my problem (100 pounds of animal falling on me, having it invade my space or the need to breath air which many people can't if it has animal hair) I'm truly wandering if this isn't a case of some news organization believing an onion article. It really seems like a picture from an onion article.