I had a similar thought reading this. The interviewee gave what the interviewer admitted were normal and valid answers, though ‘not what I was looking for’ (uh

I had a similar thought reading this. The interviewee gave what the interviewer admitted were normal and valid answers, though ‘not what I was looking for’ (uh ok—job seekers aren’t mind readers) but effectively badgered the individual into “cheating” after they repeated multiple times not knowing the fuller answer. To me, were I the interviewer at that point we’d have already moved on to the next problem set or next question in the interview.