5 ms·
is there a non-paywall version? Outline wont read it either.
by rocketpastsix 7y ago
is there a non-paywall version? Outline wont read it either.
- psim1 7y agoGuest pass link: https://www.wsj.com/articles/welcome-to-black-hat-where-the-attendees-are-the-threat-11565343002?shareToken=stfaa72b20389e4669a58d4c75c81ba9a7 https://www.wsj.com/articles/welcome-to-black-hat-where-the-... Mods, please update original.
- dsimms 7y agoWe're sorry, but this URL is not supported by Outline
- Chirael 7y agoI’d really love it if HN allowed me to save in my profile a simple “hide from me” list of domains, so I could say just don’t show me wsj.com, nytimes.com etc.
- psim1 7y agoThat would be a good feature request. At the same time, I have found WSJ to be a really valuable source of lightweight tech news as well as a few in-depth tech articles, and they regularly run promos where you get three months for a couple dollars.
- MegaDeKay 7y agoWorks fine with me with the "Bypass Paywalls" extension, available for Firefox or Chrome. https://github.com/iamadamdev/bypass-paywalls-firefox https://github.com/iamadamdev/bypass-paywalls-firefox https://github.com/iamadamdev/bypass-paywalls-chrome https://github.com/iamadamdev/bypass-paywalls-chrome
- calvano915 7y agoThat extension didn't work for me on Chrome, but "Anti-Paywall" did https://github.com/nextgens/anti-paywall https://github.com/nextgens/anti-paywall
- Fnoord 7y agoSame for me on Firefox, anti-paywall worked the other one not. If you've never been to such a conference I guess this can tell you a few things about it. Otherwise, there's nothing of value in the article anyway. Even this: > Over the course of the conference, there were 84,875 “network events,” or activities suspicious enough to make the team want to take a look. If you know about IDS and SIEM then you know that such a number is meaningless. Because if its badly configured, you are going to get a plethora of false positives. Its just meant to impress the clueless reader. An event like this can be a goldmine for blue teaming though. The pressure, the sheer amount of data, fine-tuning your rulesets, etc. But that part the article doesn't explain. Cause it doesn't sound as sexy as some high number. TL;DR if you haven't read the article, you're not missing out. Move along, move along.