3 ms·
No, ML model is not evaluated empirically at all. Measures like accuracy and precision are not empirical. Neither is generalization as evaluated by using some m
by AstralStorm 7y ago
No, ML model is not evaluated empirically at all. Measures like accuracy and precision are not empirical. Neither is generalization as evaluated by using some model data set.
These measures are statistical predictions that may or may not be correct.
Failure rate in the wild is empirical. Accuracy in the wild, the same.
Since the designer does not have access to real data, they are actually not working empirically at all and as such you get common overfitting and methods that work well on model datasets but not on real data.
- ianamartin 7y agoYou know that data scientists have access to real data, right? It's not all just kids doing tricks on kaggle? That we have the ability to actually measure shit? Do you think that all of this is a total joke? I mean, you're allowed to think that. But, umm, yeah. Real people do real things with real data. Believe it or not.