We have seen what happens when someone who should receive Government protection is able to get by without them; those protections are removed. If somebody is c

We have seen what happens when someone who should receive Government protection is able to get by without them; those protections are removed. If somebody is capable of providing for themselves, why "should" they be dependent on government services? They have tips, so they don't get minimum wage. Employers are required to make up the difference if tips don't reach minimum wage. Anything which disguised that fact, even a little, should be removed. Should be ban inexpensive food because it's just disguising how bad the government is at taking care of hungry people?