3 ms·
The claim that it is menacing or intimidating and so isn’t covered by the first amendment seems nonsensical to me. No rational person expects that the ballon t
by qtplatypus 7y ago
The claim that it is menacing or intimidating and so isn’t covered by the first amendment seems nonsensical to me. No rational person expects that the ballon to attack them.
- dymk 7y agoThe claim is that the people holding the rat will attack them, and having the rat is to advertise a threat.
- qtplatypus 7y agoBy that logic then any picket line could be banned.
- dymk 7y agoOnes that threaten violence against scabs should be.