But your article is about cryptography. And like every article on cryptography aimed at non-cryptographers it has this upshot: "You don't have a chance at knowi

But your article is about cryptography. And like every article on cryptography aimed at non-cryptographers it has this upshot: "You don't have a chance at knowing what you're doing or talking about, so please just ask a cryptographer for help and get on with your busy day." If readers of your article come away more confused about dev/random vs. dev/urandom and the veracity of manpages, that is a positive result which will lead them to the aforementioned promised land. So I don't think your article fits the (anti-)pattern.