Oops. I apologise. Indeed I framed that statement backwards. If non-interactive use makes attacks "harder" then terms and conditions should not seek to prohi

Oops. I apologise. Indeed I framed that statement backwards. If non-interactive use makes attacks "harder" then terms and conditions should not seek to prohibit non-interactive use. That is the argument in one sentence. Another phrasing is that if interactive use makes attacks easier then users should not be discouraged or prohibited from engaging in non-interactive use.