3 ms·
>threat of an active negative PR campaign I'm sorry, but this doesn't feel like an accurate characterisation. Stamos isn't financing or organising an actual PR
by FDSGSG 7y ago
>threat of an active negative PR campaign
I'm sorry, but this doesn't feel like an accurate characterisation. Stamos isn't financing or organising an actual PR campaign, he's just publicly telling the truth.
If the truth happens to be outrageous, that's not his fault.
>And the tweet I linked earlier didn't tell Voxility anything it didn't already know
Dunno, Voxility is huge.
>it simply publicized things and used the author's influence coercively.
If the truth is coercive, perhaps that's not on the author?
- ThrustVectoring 7y agoIt absolutely is organizing and advocating a campaign: https://mobile.twitter.com/alexstamos/status/1158029189896736768 https://mobile.twitter.com/alexstamos/status/115802918989673... >If the truth is coercive, perhaps that's not on the author? You're ignoring the context. Blue check with 50k followers who has testified to congress on tech matters, multiple followup tweets @voxility by others, and intense media scrutiny of 8chan and their business partners following the El Paso shooting. The exact same tweet made as a DM would not have anywhere near the pressure as what they did. The publicity itself is pressure; this is why corporate twitter accounts try to take your tweeted complaints into DMs as soon as possible.