> Despite the authenticity of a publication I wouldn't want to read 10 articles saying the same thing I agree in a mundane sense, repetition is not exciting, b

> Despite the authenticity of a publication I wouldn't want to read 10 articles saying the same thing I agree in a mundane sense, repetition is not exciting, but the sorts of large scale messages such as this one, need to be repeated across many sources of information (has Sci Am ever run an article in this before? Not the same as if Huff Post does) before it's taken seriously enough, by enough people, for something to change.