You are correct and link to a good source, so thank you, those two boxes are rare to check in a climate related contrarian-take. But don't lose track of the en

You are correct and link to a good source, so thank you, those two boxes are rare to check in a climate related contrarian-take. But don't lose track of the engineering constraint here. We not only need to get to zero emissions, we need to get to roughly -20% emissions (relative to today). So the fact that something is "only" 9% of our positive number today in no way shields it from the necessary change that's coming ASAP. Don't get me wrong, I don't mean that as a justification for behavior policing every little thing at once, but generally anything big enough to register on the gigaton scale we have to have a plan for NOW. Its too late to do this serially.