2 ms·
The article argues the information collecting people agree to isn't evil. It then goes on to describe a whole other set of activities and their consequences, b
by ben509 7y ago
The article argues the information collecting people agree to isn't evil.
It then goes on to describe a whole other set of activities and their consequences, but doesn't characterize that one way or another. I don't need the author to draw a conclusion here, but it's odd they don't.