3 ms·
Sure, but then the distinction between science / not-science hasn't got that much value. A not-science (math) is the most critical tool in the scientific toolb
by jevgeni 7y ago
Sure, but then the distinction between science / not-science hasn't got that much value.
A not-science (math) is the most critical tool in the scientific toolbox, and hence contributed more to scientific progress than any isolated branch of science.
- ivalm 7y agoSure, natural languages also contributed "more to science" than "any isolated branch" but learning a language (for its use rather than linguistics/anthropology) isnt a science. I think it is a useful distinction.