3 ms·
The vulnerabilities found in the article support your argument: SMS and MMS, which barely ever change or get new features, were much more secure than iMessage,
by panic 7y ago
The vulnerabilities found in the article support your argument: SMS and MMS, which barely ever change or get new features, were much more secure than iMessage, which constantly gets new features and architectural changes.
- wahern 7y agoThere was a Microsoft Research paper several years ago which looked at the relationship of exploits to age of code in BSD kernels. The number of exploits in older code diminished over time, but that was often offset by the higher prevalence of exploits in newer code. That much is intuitive, but it's good that there's some well researched empirical evidence showing that that's the case. We can hypothesize that better languages and better mitigations (e.g. ASLR) can improve the situation across the board, and I don't doubt that that's the case, but I haven't yet seen the evidence. (Maybe I missed it?) It's probably too early as it's difficult to make apples-to-apples comparisons across those aspects.