2 ms·
It's because I've been trying very hard to understand what your contention is. The bits about peacocking and resume-padding are... unconvincing. > ...improve U
by ng12 7y ago
It's because I've been trying very hard to understand what your contention is. The bits about peacocking and resume-padding are... unconvincing.
> ...improve UX, performance, maintainability, and development cost.
I don't buy it at all. As mentioned, I've done both professionally and there are reasons I keep picking React (or a hybrid ala Next) that don't involve a bigger paycheck or "peacocking".
- asark 7y agoIt's usually companies or management/product folks paying for their product to have the peacock feathers. See also: flat/material redesigns not to improve usability—in fact it may make it worse—but to avoid "looking old", not because users complained or metrics look bad but because someone with a budget guesses maybe they might. Similar with choices to make fairly simple sites into heavy SPAs with questionable performance. > It's because I've been trying very hard to understand what your contention is. I appreciate it. Seriously!