3 ms·
The problem with that, is that flash even as an IDE was not really suited our new responsive web. Its not really good for content or development of anything oth
by cannedslime 7y ago
The problem with that, is that flash even as an IDE was not really suited our new responsive web. Its not really good for content or development of anything other than games, animations and ads.
- Jach 7y agoDid you ever develop with Flex? MXML and CSS + ActionScript was a great way to design webapps, and if phones actually ran flash, apps and components could be just as responsive as anything modern. The closest JS ever got to it was Angular 1, but then the Angular folks changed course and whatever version it's at now is very different. My current favorite is the ClojureScript ecosystem, but it's even more different than either still, and really only suited for apps. For a plain old website composed of several pages, mostly static content, it's hard to beat plain old HTML with maybe a light sprinkle of JS for a couple things.
- cannedslime 7y agoActually I must admit that I never really gave flex a chance. Don't get me wrong, I miss the flash days as well, its actually kind of sad that open source player / recompiler projects never really got anywhere.