4 ms·

Bans https://www.baumhedlundlaw.com/toxic-tort-law/monsanto-roundup-lawsuit/where-is-glyphosate-banned/ https://www.baumhedlundlaw.com/toxic-tort-law/monsanto-r

Bans https://www.baumhedlundlaw.com/toxic-tort-law/monsanto-roundup-lawsuit/where-is-glyphosate-banned/ https://www.baumhedlundlaw.com/toxic-tort-law/monsanto-round... Carcinogenic https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1383574218300887 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S138357421... Liver damage https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1542356519303611 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S15423... Kidney https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5442867/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5442867/ (This essentially says that existing studies ruling this out are flawed) Birth Defects, brain abnormalities/illnesses https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4392553/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4392553/

refurb 7y ago
Just because you can find a paper, doesn't mean it supports the fact quoted. Your article on carcinogenic - However, given the heterogeneity between the studies included, the numerical risk estimates should be interpreted with caution. Your article on liver disease - you left out the title "in patients with fatty liver disease" Kidney disease - association, not causation Birth defects - from the conclusions "In this paper, we propose that glyphosate's chelation of Mn..may explain the recent increase in incidence of multiple neurological diseases and other pathologies." Hardly definitive conclusions.
- rhacker 7y ago
  I wouldn't suggest we have a conclusion either, but what is the acceptable risk, in your family, for example, would you eat glyphosate?
  - refurb 7y ago
    Based on glyphosate’s relative risk compared to other pesticides, disease causing bacteria or heavy metal contamination, it just doesn’t rank very high at all.