4 ms·
It’s frustrating how few cities in the US are liveable without a car. One of the best parts of SF is that it’s so small and easy to navigate without a car. And
by tempsy 7y ago
It’s frustrating how few cities in the US are liveable without a car. One of the best parts of SF is that it’s so small and easy to navigate without a car.
And NYC’s subway system is complete disarray. Not sure what other cities are manageable without one.
- driverdan 7y agoWhile US public transit is not good most US cities are livable without a car. You need some other form of personal transportation instead like a bike.
- showerst 7y agoIf you live in the city proper or inner ring suburbs, DC is fine without a car, especially if you can afford the occasional uber. I can't think of any others besides the 3 you mentioned that I'd want to go carless in offhand.
- harmmonica 7y agoIf you're talking about livable within the city limits (i.e., you don't live in the suburbs) then I think you'd find locals in Boston, DC and Chicago would say they can live happily without a car. I think a pretty significant chunk of folks in Philly, Portland (OR) and Seattle would probably say the same, though not to the same extent as those other ones. Not disagreeing that there are few overall, but there are a few beyond NYC and SF.