5 ms·
This is supposed to be a forum for civil discourse. As someone who lives in Texas but has friends and family all over the country, I don't find banning all my c
by cestith 7y ago
This is supposed to be a forum for civil discourse. As someone who lives in Texas but has friends and family all over the country, I don't find banning all my calls from crossing state lines to be a very civil suggestion. How about all the calls that spoof Illinois numbers that call my Illinois-numbered cell phone? How is keeping me from calling my mother going to stop that?
Fuck your ban.
- paulie_a 7y agoEasily. It's the nuclear option. The state of Texas will make arrests for the illegal Industry they allow. It will force action. One day later you can call your mother And please don't give me a lecture about civil discourse. I clearly stated my opinion If I am banned. Fuck my ban as you clearly stated
- cestith 7y agoYou clearly stated your opinion that people in Texas should not be allowed to call people in other states. That's what you clearly stated.
- paulie_a 7y agoYes I did. What point we're you attempting to make.
- cestith 7y agoMy point is why are you trying to punish 25 million Texans and 18 million Floridians for a bunch of people in India using VOIP to make calls appear as if they're from all over the US? How is that effective or ethical? Wouldn't it make more sense to punish the phone companies letting them do this? Is this just prejudicial hatred on your part against a couple of states you don't like for some reason?
- klyrs 7y agoThe reason people are reacting badly to this is that your suggestion amounts to collective punishment, which is widely recognized as a human rights concern. Your suggestion is uncivilized. We've got a right to critique it. If you feel "lectured," that's your problem.