4 ms·
He didn't rehash arguments that he had made on the Racket mailing list in his blog post. Here is one example: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/racket-users
by hinkelman 7y ago
He didn't rehash arguments that he had made on the Racket mailing list in his blog post. Here is one example: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/racket-users/vN_1uUJZnXo/5bXiMEBvCgAJ https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/racket-users/vN_1uUJZn...
- dTal 7y agoI'm not talking about his specific objections to the proposal. I'm talking about why those objections, which seem to be taking place in the context of a reasonable discussion where everyone's opinion is heard, have led him to the conclusion that he will no longer enjoy participating in the Racket community.
- hinkelman 7y agoThis is a key line from his post: "Also to be fair, if you have some mileage on your odometer, your pattern-recognition machinery will quickly assign high probabilities to various outcomes." His combination of personality and experience is leading him to draw conclusions about where Racket2 is headed that is causing him to press pause on using (and contributing to) Racket. I had a similar reaction (described in this post: https://www.travishinkelman.com/post/exploring-scheme-implementations/ https://www.travishinkelman.com/post/exploring-scheme-implem...). It seems that you are not assigning as high of probability to the outcomes that Greg is concerned about. Or you are not as concerned about those outcomes.