3 ms·
No, it's because large parts of the hippocratic oath are outdated and involve refusal to teach medicine to those not in the fraternity, and refusing abortions.
by stuartbman 7y ago
No, it's because large parts of the hippocratic oath are outdated and involve refusal to teach medicine to those not in the fraternity, and refusing abortions.
In the UK, this has been replaced by Duties of a Doctor, which is much more progressive.
- Tomte 7y agoAlso, the duty to teach your own teacher's son is a bit outdated.
- yters 7y agoI suspect the controversial part of the oath is the following: 'Neither will I administer a poison to anybody when asked to do so, nor will I suggest such a course. Similarly I will not give to a woman a pessary to cause abortion.' Like I said, not killing people is so behind the times :D Of course, perhaps there is a bit of concern people may have when the person holding their life in their hands no longer takes an oath to preserve it, but what did the ancients know?