3 ms·
To quote that report on which the second article is based: “While the most important provisions of the NFA remain substantially intact, no jurisdiction fully c
by tomhoward 7y ago
To quote that report on which the second article is based:
“While the most important provisions of the NFA remain substantially intact, no jurisdiction fully complies” [1]
But those claims in that article, and the description of them in the video, seem overblown.
I understand the authors are trying to sound an alarm in order to prevent any significant retreat from the positive changes that happened in 1996.
But that's all it is.
There is no claim that Australia's gun ownership or gun violence problems are back to pre-1996 levels and there is no evidence to back such a claim.
If you look at the various statistics on this page [2], the key figures remain substantially lower than their 1996 levels, including Rate of Civilian Firearm Possession per 100 Population and Number of Licensed Firearm Owners, and they have not materially increased in the past 10 years.
We just don't have a gun culture or gun violence problem in Australia. The total number may have risen, but apart from very narrow exceptions, none of them are semiautomatic or automatic, and I gather almost all are for use in farming and pest control on private land (pests including foxes and rabbits are significant problems for farmers in Australia).
Most notably, the rates of gun-related homicides and other fatalities in Australia remain extremely low by world standards [3].
[1] https://sydney.edu.au/news-opinion/news/2017/10/05/australia-slipping-backwards-on-national-firearms-agreement.html https://sydney.edu.au/news-opinion/news/2017/10/05/australia...
[2] https://www.gunpolicy.org/firearms/compareyears/10/rate_of_civilian_firearm_possession https://www.gunpolicy.org/firearms/compareyears/10/rate_of_c...
[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_firearm-related_death_rate https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_firearm-r...