> What's not hypothetical is that scores of people are dying in the meantime. What’s hypothetical is that banning 8ch will do anything about that. > Furthermo

> What's not hypothetical is that scores of people are dying in the meantime. What’s hypothetical is that banning 8ch will do anything about that. > Furthermore, the First Amendment was designed by the founders as a way to protect citizens who criticized the government. I find it unbelievable that they themselves would support extending those protections towards people who would seek to explicitly provoke mass, random violence. Another thing that’s hypothetical. > I still haven't heard a good reason why forums that are havens for users openly and explicitly encouraging terroristic acts should not bear any responsibility, beyond lazy slippery slope arguments. Considering you’re just dismissing the presented argument as a fallacy, it’s surprising that your own argument contains so little substance. Or is it?