3 ms·
I think that without macros, any language claiming to "replace lisp" is only doing so superficially. EDIT: Just to clarify, I don't think the Haskell designers
by hvs 16y ago
I think that without macros, any language claiming to "replace lisp" is only doing so superficially.
EDIT: Just to clarify, I don't think the Haskell designers are claiming that it "replaces lisp," just that this blog entry does.
- jsmcgd 16y agoI used to think so too until I learnt about Haskell's very lazy evaluation. It's worth reading up.