4 ms·
I don't disagree about the name that should be used, as I said. I just think calling it colonial needs a little more context for people who would not unreasonab
by vinay427 7y ago
I don't disagree about the name that should be used, as I said. I just think calling it colonial needs a little more context for people who would not unreasonably assume it's something more similar to Western colonialism of India or something.
On that note, "India"/Hindustan/Hindu/etc. are somewhat similarly colonial-rooted names, ironically popularized by the Iranians.
- ptah 7y ago"western colonialism" is redundant. "colonialism" will suffice :)