3 ms·
At one point, that's a coward's stance. Alexandra Elbakyan's contribution to scientific research at this stage is probably higher than any university's library
by Iv 7y ago
At one point, that's a coward's stance.
Alexandra Elbakyan's contribution to scientific research at this stage is probably higher than any university's library.
Recognize that everyone uses it because none of the legal options are acceptable. Say it and urge a long overdue change in copyright laws.
It is abnormal that Elbakyan is the outlaw and Elsevier the respectable institution here.
- dtech 7y agoEndorsing a US-law breaking site like SciHub could place them on the hook for legal repercussions. This non-endorsement endorsement achieves the same goals without the above liability.
- Iv 7y agoMeanwhile, a courageous girl broke some laws with no gain for her, because she thought research was important. If the 10 biggest university libraries endorsed sci-hub, yeah, there could be legal repercussions but that could also move the lines much more than this timid non-endorsement endorsement.
- malms 7y agoShe's a superstar now, could make money from ad or bribes with no personal risk. I would have done the same
- Iv 7y agoYeah, right, no personal risks except being sued out of existence if she ever attempts that in any country that implements copyright laws. Haven't we learned anything from Aaron Swartz?
- inflatableDodo 7y ago>It is abnormal that Elbakyan is the outlaw and Elsevier the respectable institution here. Rather than abnormal, is an archetype by this point, given the case is viewed almost universally as a Robin Hood vs Sheriff of Nottingham kind of a thing.
- buboard 7y agoEveryone uses sci hub, i dont even think it needs advertising. It is used even more by people who legally have access to subscriptions[1]. I prefer it too - it is faster than the often horribly slow official sites https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/04/whos-downloading-pirated-papers-everyone https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/04/whos-downloading-pir...