3 ms·
can be argued that it was in the best interests of its users and faithful to the product's original mission If you're willing to pay the tens of millions of do
by ZachPruckowski 16y ago
can be argued that it was in the best interests of its users and faithful to the product's original mission
If you're willing to pay the tens of millions of dollars and take the PR hit that is a government anti-trust lawsuit, you may eventually have the privilege of making that argument before a federal judge, who probably isn't technology literate enough to comprehend it. Let's face facts here, this conversation goes over the heads of 80% of internet users. The judge is going to see "the federal government accuses them of restraining this site's trade by removing them from the search index, and Google admits to it" and then that's the ballgame.
Or maybe the government never gets around to suing Google. Or maybe they get a judge who knows this sort of stuff already. But that's still a scenario keeping Google's Legal Dept. up at night.
- bad_user 16y agoYeah, but that would be like suing Microsoft for making Windows more secure because that can "restrain the trade of companies producing Antiviruses". That would be a pretty stupid argument, even in the face of a non-technical jury, wouldn't it? Of course, the negative image would hurt, but lets be honest, the suit against Microsoft accomplished basically nothing it couldn't handle, while waisting taxpayer's money. Are these antitrust suits getting started so easily?
- jarek 16y agoOr like suing Microsoft for making the computers that ship with its OS more useful by including Office cheaply...