3 ms·
He is pointing out a very important reality though. First you prove physical viability. Then engineering viability. Finally, after operating a full commercial u
by acidburnNSA 7y ago
He is pointing out a very important reality though. First you prove physical viability. Then engineering viability. Finally, after operating a full commercial unit for a while, you may prove economic viability. It's easy to assume physical viability leads to economic viability but this really is not the case.
- pfdietz 7y agoIf you can show by general arguments that engineering viability is unlikely, demonstrating physics viability is pointless.
- hairytrog 7y agoit's a she.
- acidburnNSA 7y agoOh crap. I'm sorry. Thanks for the correction. Too late for it to let me edit.