3 ms·
Signed HTTP exchanges. It was actually the main complaint about AMP because it caused confusion among users. Technically it makes no difference wether the conte
by v7p1Qbt1im 7y ago
Signed HTTP exchanges. It was actually the main complaint about AMP because it caused confusion among users. Technically it makes no difference wether the content is hosted by the author or any AMP CDN.
The question is more a philosophical one. If it’s wrong that the URL doesn’t point to where files are “actually” stored. Or rather that the package delivery and package creator aren’t the same party. In my mind this hasn’t been the case for a long time now anyway.
https://amp.dev/documentation/guides-and-tutorials/optimize-and-measure/signed-exchange/ https://amp.dev/documentation/guides-and-tutorials/optimize-...
- RobertRoberts 7y agoI would argue the issue is not technical at all, and this should not be part of the discussion. The issue is deceit and fraud. A browser should _never_ ever under any circumstances be able to display one companies domain differently than all others. Especially when it's their domain. Google.com, or any of Alphabet's domains, should not get special preference or treatment. And they certainly should not be trimmed out of an address for the benefit of Alphabet/Google to the detriment of all others.