6 ms·
What? You have literally written 0 arguments that relate to the text in any meaningful way.
by sprafa 7y ago
What? You have literally written 0 arguments that relate to the text in any meaningful way.
- ThomPete 7y agoI thought it was a pretty simple argument though. We won't abandon hydrocarbon sources anytime soon because there aren't any alternatives no matter what gets written in articles from people who want to abolish it.
- sprafa 7y agoThe article is about renewables becoming cheaper and more competitive with hydrocarbons as we speak. Even in the absence of a carbon tax to pay back for its huge externalities. Do you have some evidence the fall in prices of ie solar will not happen even though it’s trending that way? That would be more interesting than your blanket statement.
- ThomPete 7y agoWhich is not true as renewables need backup energy which isnt calculated in. Investments into renewables is falling and stagnating not increasing.
- sprafa 7y agoPlease share sources and data and stop posting blanket statements.
- ThomPete 7y agohttps://www.globalresearch.ca/growth-renewables-stalled-investment-falling/5678889?fbclid=IwAR0Sd3mRotIjpUDmwO-6M1t9lQ4buvB8BW8ceQBlJesRA5b4rgUW23Af7FU https://www.globalresearch.ca/growth-renewables-stalled-inve...
- sprafa 7y agoI am at work but the whole article is very interesting and completely focused on other things other than what you mentioned - basically failed policies to encourage private investment have caused lower and lower investment. The article then goes on to suggest new alternative policies. This is from speed reading. Reply?
- ThomPete 7y agoI said investments in renewables are decreasing especially when you remove china. That's what the article talks about and that the reality. You can look for other sources which will tell you the same. Investments in wind and solar despite the hype isn't exploding it's stagnating and even dropping.