I think who is getting the money should be as important to the case as the fact money was going to them. The legal doctrine they used to distribute the money li

I think who is getting the money should be as important to the case as the fact money was going to them. The legal doctrine they used to distribute the money like this is supposed to be used to benefit the class members indirectly (because giving each party a small amount of money directly would be silly). How does giving money to Stanford and Harvard help anyone?