4 ms·
> Keep talking about the software. Make it about the software, so no one knows the airframe is fundamentally flawed. It's pretty clear that the author of the c
by rrss 7y ago
> Keep talking about the software. Make it about the software, so no one knows the airframe is fundamentally flawed.
It's pretty clear that the author of the comment I originally responded to was not considering software.
- bronson 7y agoTheir point was about the way Boeing is trying (and mostly succeeding) in steering media coverage about the MAX-8. (If Boeing keeps discussion on the micro issues, maybe they won't have to publicly address a macro problem). Their comment doesn't take a position on whether software is a fundamental part of the airframe or not. Yours does.