4 ms·
Hang on. I think you're missing the point. It's not about how "if you've read one, you've read them all". The fact that MacBeth is another way to tell the Futil
by squirrelicus 7y ago
Hang on. I think you're missing the point. It's not about how "if you've read one, you've read them all". The fact that MacBeth is another way to tell the Futile Struggle Against Fate story doesn't in any way diminish the creativity or power or uniqueness of the work. The point is that if it's not an archetypical story it won't resonate with the human mind, and the writer will fail.
We tell the same stories again and again because there's a finite set of stories that engage our mind, whether we like it or not.
- dragonsngoblins 7y agoBut my point is the archetypes are so broad they may as well be meaningless. "Futile Struggle Against Fate" encompasses so much. May as well say all stories are "Man vs Man" or "Man vs Nature" or "Man vs God". Sure you can categorize basically every story into one of those three things but it is almost never useful to do so