Well, claiming that it is compliant even though it isn't, is false advertising, so that is how it should be applied, rather than requiring compliance even for t

Well, claiming that it is compliant even though it isn't, is false advertising, so that is how it should be applied, rather than requiring compliance even for the thing that isn't supposed to be. They already require warning labels on some stuff, so it should be required that warning label too, then, maybe.