> evidence for an offense you can't imagine ten years from now. If your argument rests on future, unknown abuses... I'm afraid that's tin foil territory. Your

> evidence for an offense you can't imagine ten years from now. If your argument rests on future, unknown abuses... I'm afraid that's tin foil territory. Your comments sound like regurgitated talking points from when Snowden was in the news, so I'm not sure who you think you're educating about fingerprinting, etc. It's been common knowledge for years.