3 ms·
and what about http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qi_%28programming_language%29 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qi_%28programming_language%29 (via @fogus)?? Choose haske
by jneira 16y ago
and what about http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qi_%28programming_language%29 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qi_%28programming_language%29 (via @fogus)?? Choose haskell as the only way to programming nirvana could be eliminate other differents points of view. In fact choose whatever will do
- thesz 16y agoWhen my post started a heated conversation in ru_lisp LiveJournal community, someone told there about his personal experience with Qi. He managed to convince Qi that 42 is of type String. That's the price of freedom of Lisp.