5 ms·
Did you read the article? There is a clear statistical anomaly centered about 10 years before reliable birth records were introduced. You are ex post facto ra
by georgeburdell 7y ago
Did you read the article? There is a clear statistical anomaly centered about 10 years before reliable birth records were introduced. You are ex post facto rationalizing the longevity of a region for where there is evidence of age-related fraud.
- mytailorisrich 7y agoThank you for your nice reply. I was making a general point independent of any fraud or lack of records.
- dang 7y ago"Please don't comment on whether someone read an article. "Did you even read the article? It mentions that" can be shortened to "The article mentions that."" https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
- gpderetta 7y agoI did read the article, and the anomaly only exists (or at least is shown) only for US data.