3 ms·
Whether or not people want the government to do it implies nothing about whether the government would be good at doing it. And neither of those things imply an
by polytomous_ 7y ago
Whether or not people want the government to do it implies nothing about whether the government would be good at doing it. And neither of those things imply anything about whether private insurers are good at checking doctor's orders.
I would say that for any reasonable definition of "good", whether in skill or virtue, private insurers have shown they are definitely not good actors in our health system. Our health system might just be better off without them.
As for your question, I for one would like _doctors_ to double-check doctors' orders. Not an actuary.
- alistairSH 7y agoAs for your question, I for one would like _doctors_ to double-check doctors' orders. Not an actuary. To be fair, with private insurers, it's usually BOTH a doctor and an actuary reviewing care. Which isn't to imply I like insurance - I'd much prefer an NHS-style system where my taxes fund the majority of care and I can buy a private policy if I want a "Cadillac" plan.