It's still absurd to me. > There will be some CDNs who do not make the ethical choice. That's a fact of life. - We want everyone to ban it (because that's the

It's still absurd to me. > There will be some CDNs who do not make the ethical choice. That's a fact of life. - We want everyone to ban it (because that's the ethical way). But government banning it is not okay. - Government enforcing the ban is not okay. But CloudFlare enforcing it is okay. I don't think CloudFlare (or any company) is equipped to make this kind of judgement. The process would be secretive and biased. Government is much better equipped, and the process would be more open. That's why I would be more comfortable with government taking the lead on this kind of judgement. I guess we're just gonna agree to disagree on this one. > you can host a CDN outside of US jurisdiction if you really want. I'd say outside of US is really out of the scope here. We don't really have much power to enforce anything outside US. If we're gonna expand our scope to outside of US, there will many many more horrendous things to discuss. And the discussion would never end.