3 ms·
In your statement above you bemoan that without absolute rights we must "constantly debate where _the line_ is" Here you concede "those are all good questions
by jmull 7y ago
In your statement above you bemoan that without absolute rights we must "constantly debate where _the line_ is"
Here you concede "those are all good questions that need to be carefully considered".
...so we're right back to debating where the line is.
I'm not seeing a coherent argument here.
- saintPirelli 7y agoI'm saying that knowing a right should be absolute and - for example - not knowing how to enforce this right for everyone, are not mutually exclusive.