4 ms·
Recaptcha had a good run but it’s time for it to die imho.
by thepangolino 7y ago
Recaptcha had a good run but it’s time for it to die imho.
- akie 7y agoThat's nice & all, but there's no good replacement that works as well (for example against a dedicated attacker with a botnet).
- rubbingalcohol 7y agoThat doesn't mean it's worth using.
- newaccoutnas 7y agoAgreed, it's morphed into something a lot more evil than stopping bots. The amount of heuristics it now collects in v3 is quite something. Check for your score yourself https://recaptcha-demo.appspot.com/recaptcha-v3-request-scores.php https://recaptcha-demo.appspot.com/recaptcha-v3-request-scor...
- burkaman 7y ago> This is a sample implementation, the score returned here is not a reflection on your Google account or type of traffic. I got 0.9 and then 0.3 after refreshing.
- SquareWheel 7y agoThat's by design. Hitting the same endpoints multiple times is botty behaviour. I got 0.9 three times, then 0.7 on the fourth.
- lazyjones 7y agoWhat's your solution against a dedicated attacker?
- rubbingalcohol 7y agoTo be attacked.
- penagwin 7y ago> for example against a dedicated attacker with a botnet Do you have experience with this? My understanding is that there's still trivial work arounds (See chrome extension "Buster") or services where you pay to have a human go through it for pennies. If somebody is targeting your site then your captcha will be useless no matter what.