The article goes awry from the first sentence: > If election security is an engineering problem, It's not an engineering problem, it's a political problem. T

The article goes awry from the first sentence: > If election security is an engineering problem, It's not an engineering problem, it's a political problem. To the extent that it's engineering, it's solved if we would only adopt the known good approaches. But we won't because there is political utility in having elections remain murky and messy for parties who may benefit from manipulation of the vote through disenfranchisement or other shenanigans.