What is this nonsense? First you bet I won't respond then claim I haven't? You're not discussing this in good faith. > specifically, which of the threats would

What is this nonsense? First you bet I won't respond then claim I haven't? You're not discussing this in good faith. > specifically, which of the threats would you ban if you controlled YouTube and those threats were made on YouTube? I answered that. I personally wouldn't ban any of these including the 14 year old in question. > specifically, which of the linked examples do you think is most directly comparable to this I don't think any of them is "equivalent", but a policy that bans one should ban the other. I'm not in favor of "rules lawyers" constructing an elaborate system that bans some threats and depictions of violence but excuses others.