3 ms·
We're discussing anti-competitive behavior, and it seems this is a clear exhibition of that. It's not about what intrinsic value any particular seller can brin
by Alupis 7y ago
We're discussing anti-competitive behavior, and it seems this is a clear exhibition of that.
It's not about what intrinsic value any particular seller can bring - it's whether or not Amazon has become a defacto monopoly and/or practices anti-competitive behaviors.
- toasterlovin 7y agoAmazon doesn’t have a monopoly. They sell less than Walmart. You can take your products elsewhere. Your problem is with Amazon doing on their platform what every brick and mortar does in their own stores.
- dodobirdlord 7y ago> We're discussing anti-competitive behavior, and it seems this is a clear exhibition of that. It's not anti-competitive behavior, it's just ordinary competitive behavior. Sometimes Amazon decides to compete with the sellers on its platform, and woe betide them when it happens because Amazon is an extremely competitive business. Anti-competitive behavior is when you interfere in someone else's ability to compete with you. No amount of outcompeting competitors can make a business anti-competitive. It's almost a tautology.