3 ms·
It's intolerant for a woman to want an abortion. She's not tolerating the continued existence of the child.
by antepodius 7y ago
It's intolerant for a woman to want an abortion. She's not tolerating the continued existence of the child.
- pritambaral 7y agoIf it is established that a child exists as of the moment when the expectant wants an abortion, then yes her abortion would be intolerance of the continued existence of the child. In fact, in many jurisdictions that allow abortion at some stages of pregnancy, there are stages of pregnancy where it is accepted that a child exists (or similar) and thus abortion (without other conditions) is not allowed. But a debate on in which stages a child exists during a pregnancy is not the debate we are having here.
- antepodius 7y agoI'm not really an anti-abortionist. You can replace 'child' with 'fetus', if you like; my point is just that the word itself applies to any preference over world states.
- pritambaral 7y agoLet me re-iterate: What is a 'child' is not the debate here.