> "You have the right to speak freely as long as you can't effectively do it" That's a pretty gross misrepresentation of what I said. Think of it another way.

> "You have the right to speak freely as long as you can't effectively do it" That's a pretty gross misrepresentation of what I said. Think of it another way. Prior to the internet could TV and radio stations be forced to play an ad they disagree with? Could newspapers and magazines be forced to print ads or op-eds they disagree with? You cannot force someone else to carry your message. If you are unable to broadcast the message yourself and nobody else is willing to broadcast it for you then that is your own issue. No private entity is responsible for giving you a platform.