Most people understand that fine. It's about freedom of speech as a social principle and value, not strictly a matter of law. It's granted that people are with

Most people understand that fine. It's about freedom of speech as a social principle and value, not strictly a matter of law. It's granted that people are within their rights to throw out speech they dislike and that there's a world of difference between severing a voluntary business relationship and the deployment of state force, but the implications of an anxious, PR-sensitive set of internet infrastructure providers is certainly fair game for discussion. If we get into the habit of shutting down every site that attracts a spate of negative attention, it still has the aggregate effect of chilling free discourse. If a shooter came onto HN and posted a manifesto here, would it withstand the mainstream media onslaught?