4 ms·
This was well cited with a lot of fun media references. The author makes a few interesting points on rationale for randomization, calling known unknowns and con
by d4mi3n 7y ago
This was well cited with a lot of fun media references. The author makes a few interesting points on rationale for randomization, calling known unknowns and confounding factors as something one could plan for and avoid.
Anybody know of other writers that do research and writing in this style? I quite enjoyed it.
- inetsee 7y agoGwern Branwen has a large body of work on a broad range of topics. You could go to the top of his web page https://www.gwern.net/ https://www.gwern.net/ , pick a topic that interests you, and start reading.
- fireattack 7y agoI admire his site, but for some reason, I found his content very hard to digest. I can read if someone links to any particular article, but browsing through the index is very overwhelming to me. I don't know if it's just the sheer amount of content that feels intimidating or anything else (like reading long paragraphs of sans-serif fonts on screen).
- rsync 7y ago"Anybody know of other writers that do research and writing in this style? I quite enjoyed it." This is what immediately comes to mind: https://slatestarcodex.com/ https://slatestarcodex.com/