The problem here is that you don't see the difference between the informal "should" from the first stance and the legal "should" from the third. You can't even

The problem here is that you don't see the difference between the informal "should" from the first stance and the legal "should" from the third. You can't even say things like "the internet legally should X" because the internet is not a single entity that can be coerced to do X (yep, the legal talk all comes down to the issue of who should be coerced to do what). Read Hayek BTW.