3 ms·
Shooting people is obviously against freedom, should be illegal and is illegal. You're insinuating that if freedom of speech laws in the US were less principle
by lone_haxx0r 7y ago
Shooting people is obviously against freedom, should be illegal and is illegal.
You're insinuating that if freedom of speech laws in the US were less principled, those people wouldn't have died. But maybe if news outlets didn't report on mass shootings those people wouldn't have died too, should we prohibit news outlets from reporting these things?
It's not the fault of free speech that some mentally unstable person killed people, the same way it's not the fault of the journalists that report these tragedies.
- anigbrowl 7y agoIt's not the fault of free speech that some mentally unstable person killed people Assumes facts not in evidence
- whenchamenia 7y agoI think you need to prove that words killed, not the other way around. Freedon is the default.
- anigbrowl 7y agoI'm talking about the assumption of mental illness.